<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Better Way to Knit Cables? Give &#8216;em a Right Hook!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knitforbrains.net/2009/08/28/a-new-and-better-way-to-knit-cables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knitforbrains.net/techniques/knitting-cables/a-new-and-better-way-to-knit-cables/</link>
	<description>Smart Man Knitting Smart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:49:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://knitforbrains.net/techniques/knitting-cables/a-new-and-better-way-to-knit-cables/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knitforbrains.net/?p=214#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link. I tried this and while I&#039;m sure I need more practice, after four trials of this technique I&#039;m not so sure it&#039;s less precarious or easier than the other pinch method. The slip-knit-pinch-swap-knit approach it uses does add a tiny bit of breathing room during the pinch and swap part, but there are still loose loops that can come undone if not careful. I found it touchy. Again, a lot of practice would make this easier. Make yourself a cable practice swatch about thirty stitches wide and do lots of them to see if this method will work for you. I&#039;m not crazy about it as my crochet hook method is easier from the start and definitely more secure. 

Another thing I found is that where Grumperina says to put the yarn in front, for Portuguese style you would not do that or you get a yarnover. Leave the yarn on top / in back as for a knit stitch as usual in the Portuguese style. Knit the second set of loops. This will also leave a sort of float behind the slipped stitches. You may want to pinch that in your pinch-swap to deter the loose loops from pulling out. The float will disappear when you knit the remaining set of loops. 

I have &lt;a href=&quot;http://knitforbrains.net/?p=231&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another post&lt;/a&gt; on yet another way of doing a cable, this time with a third straight needle, that is pretty handy. It sounds ideal for when you have a lot of cables to do. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link. I tried this and while I&#8217;m sure I need more practice, after four trials of this technique I&#8217;m not so sure it&#8217;s less precarious or easier than the other pinch method. The slip-knit-pinch-swap-knit approach it uses does add a tiny bit of breathing room during the pinch and swap part, but there are still loose loops that can come undone if not careful. I found it touchy. Again, a lot of practice would make this easier. Make yourself a cable practice swatch about thirty stitches wide and do lots of them to see if this method will work for you. I&#8217;m not crazy about it as my crochet hook method is easier from the start and definitely more secure. </p>
<p>Another thing I found is that where Grumperina says to put the yarn in front, for Portuguese style you would not do that or you get a yarnover. Leave the yarn on top / in back as for a knit stitch as usual in the Portuguese style. Knit the second set of loops. This will also leave a sort of float behind the slipped stitches. You may want to pinch that in your pinch-swap to deter the loose loops from pulling out. The float will disappear when you knit the remaining set of loops. </p>
<p>I have <a  href="http://knitforbrains.net/?p=231" rel="nofollow">another post</a> on yet another way of doing a cable, this time with a third straight needle, that is pretty handy. It sounds ideal for when you have a lot of cables to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eightoclock</title>
		<link>http://knitforbrains.net/techniques/knitting-cables/a-new-and-better-way-to-knit-cables/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>eightoclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knitforbrains.net/?p=214#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing over on Ravelry!

This basic idea of &quot;rearrange and then knit&quot; has been around for quite a while. Actually, the last Interweave Knits had an article on exactly this, although they didn&#039;t use a crochet hook for the rearranging.

As an idea, there&#039;s one more method you might try.

http://www.grumperina.com/cables.htm

It&#039;s a bit more elegant and involves fewer steps. With this method there is no extra implement, and you actually work half the cable before the rearranging. There&#039;s a pinch involved, but the pinch is done on stitches that have already been worked, and so they&#039;re way looser and less precarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing over on Ravelry!</p>
<p>This basic idea of &#8220;rearrange and then knit&#8221; has been around for quite a while. Actually, the last Interweave Knits had an article on exactly this, although they didn&#8217;t use a crochet hook for the rearranging.</p>
<p>As an idea, there&#8217;s one more method you might try.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.grumperina.com/cables.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.grumperina.com/cables.htm</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit more elegant and involves fewer steps. With this method there is no extra implement, and you actually work half the cable before the rearranging. There&#8217;s a pinch involved, but the pinch is done on stitches that have already been worked, and so they&#8217;re way looser and less precarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

